The "Risk-Averse" Candidate: Why 40% of Talent Won't Move for Less than 10%

Market Updates By Me2Works Published on 14/01/2026

Designed by Freepik



If your recruitment team is reporting "ghosting" or rejected offers this week, you are likely facing the 2026 Security Paradox. While hiring sentiment has rebounded (with 34% of employers planning to hire), candidate confidence has not fully recovered.


The Insight: 

According to recent market data, Job Security is now prioritized by 40% of talent, a sharp rise from previous years.


  • The Problem: Candidates view a probation period at a new firm as a "risk." To offset this risk, they are demanding a "risk premium"—typically a 15-20% salary increase.


  • The Conflict: 83% of Hong Kong employers have capped their 2026 increment budgets at 6%.


How to Bridge the Gap: 

You cannot always win on salary, so you must lower the "perceived risk":


  • The "Probation Buy-Out": Offer to waive the probation period for senior hires if they are headhunted.


  • Longer Notice Periods: Ironically, offering a longer notice period (e.g., 3 months instead of 1) in the contract can signal stability to a risk-averse candidate.


  • Show the Runway: In interviews, explicitly share your department's P&L or 2-year funding roadmap. Prove to them that the role won't be made redundant in Q4.



💡In 2026, "Safety" is the new "Sign-on Bonus."